Goughs legal beagle

Naming and Shaming a corrupt solictior

When I started this blog I had faith in the British Legal system, after four years I have discovered that a completely different set of standards and LAWS apply to our legal profession. This is a corruption of our legal process as solicitors and the regulatory authorities have awarded themselves a different set standards and laws that the rest of us don’t benefit from.

I have religiously followed the complaints procedures of all the regulatory authorities and have met with indifference and a stonewall of denial from all of them, but the fact remains that a practising solicitor LIED about all his qualifications for over two years and even wrote two letters to me in which he referenced his false qualifications. As well as falsely representing himself in my opinion he misdirected a court, a Cafcass Officer and concealed funds amounting to £35,000 from the courts, but I cant find a court to test my evidence

I feel that it is in the public interest to know the name of this solicitor and the firm that he works for. Mr Balh Blah is in fact Mr Peter Boyce of Goughs of Chippenham.

Despite all the previous problems with his inaccurate online CV, his current webpage is displaying yet another  inaccuracy and has been doing so since August of this year. The Law Society Family Panel has been replaced by the Family Law Accreditation Scheme which is run by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. It is not clear whether Mr Boyce has applied or has been accepted for membership of the accreditation  scheme, yet he still claims membership of the  Family Panel. This is despite my alerting both the Solicitors Regulation Authority,  and Mr Peter Boyce and Mr Nick Davis the senior partner at Goughs Of Chippenham, of this inaccurate claim.

This warning is to any potential client, to think very carefully about employing the services of a legal firm that in my opinion concealed evidence from a Law Society investigation and were complicit in mis directing  a divorce court as well as having a blatant disregard for Resolutions Code of Practice, a legal firm that is fully supportive of one of their partners who BLATANTLY falsely represents himself for two years.

You have been warned.